https://ift.tt/3qbKYKO Billy Markus Thrashes Mozilla for It’s Decisions on Crypto

• Mozilla started raising a crypto donation a few weeks back.
• Mozilla stops the crypto donation program amidst crypto being ponzi.
• Dogecoin founder, Billy Markus thrashes Mozilla for it’s decisions.

Mozilla, one of the oldest and largest web browser applications created a hustle upon the crypto industry with it’s announcement of starting to accept crypto donations. In spite of this, the program went about for a few days. However, Mozilla suddenly stopped the crypto donation program, stating crypto to be ponzi. This indeed created a huge speculation in the industry.

Mozilla’s Decisions

By the end of 2021, by December 31, Mozilla took to twitter, posting a tweet mentioning it’s acceptance of various cryptocurrencies as donations towards the Mozilla foundation. This move by Mozilla was appreciated by everyone. The prominent cryptos which were accepted by Mozilla were Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Dogecoin (DOGE) and much more.

However, crypto acceptance was not present for a longtime. It ran only for a week or less though. This was due to the fact that Mozilla has paused all it’s crypto donations, as many termed crypto to be a complete ponzi.

 In spite of this, the co-founder of Mozilla, Jamie Zawinski states that all those involved in coming with such a decision to accept crypto should be ashamed. In addition, Zawinski terms that no one should go ahead and support a completely world-killing ponzi scheme. 

Also, Zawinski utters that the crypto industry only produces pollution and converts this pollution into sick money. 

In spite of such deceitful statements uttered officially by Mozilla, the co-founder of Dogecoin (DOGE), Billy Markus takes to twitter, posting a tweet completely thrashing Mozilla for it’s views and decisions on crypto. 

Accordingly, Markus states that Mozilla should first be appreciated for taking random statements from the internet and believing them. In addition, Markus points out that Mozilla is being completely ignorant for various true facts. Moreover, he criticizes Mozilla vividly and hysterically that they would first take into account the environmental effects of papers and banking sectors accounts for. 

Besides, he points out that Mozilla would never come up with such comments in regards with environmental factors and impacts caused by the crypto industry.