Why Proof of Stake is Flawed with Lane Rettig — What Bitcoin Did https://cryptonewmedia.press/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Why-Proof-of-Stake-is-Flawed-with-Lane-Rettig-—.jpg

Why Proof of Stake is Flawed with Lane Rettig — What Bitcoin Did

https://ift.tt/3pePSXe


**If a PoS system loses consensus, how does it get back on track?**

Any system that has **weak subjectivity in its consensus system** has to do the following…

Find some central authority to decide which state to pick eg core developers ( if they can somewhat automate this process by providing a patch )

I vaguely remember, this happening to several shitcoins ( i haven’t kept track) where important nodes crashed when there was a transaction spike and the developers had to freeze the network to restore it.

It also happened to BAB – Bcash2, (due to very big blocks in a row ) which has reorg protection so important nodes had to ask the dev’ which chain is the main one and reorg to it manually…. **( all this times you could continually double spend your coins on both chains if you split them correctly lol )**

There is something much worse than PoS, its what bcash implemented. It takes the worst parts from both systems ( Weak subjectivity and high energy consumption ) and combines it.

In bcash PoW is used to _ONLY_ order the last 11 blocks

And their community brags about how they follow the WP…. /facepalm

Cryptocurrency

Get In Touch